Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 Conn. 210 - State v. Tolisano

State v. Tolisano’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
7
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably State v. Sharpe (1985), State v. Perkins (2004)

6 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

15019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ferrone · Beard v. United States · Baum v. State · Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co. · Mower v. State Department of Health

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he telephone calls are admissible as evidence that bets were being placed but not that the statements made to the officers were true. The evidence is admitted, not as exception to the hearsay rule, but because it is not within the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.