136 Conn. App. 391 - State v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3156 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc. · State v. Carter · State v. Miranda · State v. Dehaney · United States v. Dillard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In assessing the probative value of the evidence of certain convictions the court looks at the underlying facts and circumstances of the crime in order to determine whether the victim's convictions are too remote in time or lacking elements of violence. [E]videntiary rulings will be overturned on appeal only where there was an abuse of discretion and a showing by the defendant of substantial prejudice or injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Dehaney, 261 Conn. 336 , 354-55, 803 A.2d 267 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1217 , 123 S.Ct. 1318 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1070 (2003).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.