Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 CONNAPP 568 - State v. Artis

State v. Artis’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Neil v. Biggers · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Manson v. Brathwaite · Arizona v. Fulminante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine whether an identification that resulted from an unnecessarily suggestive procedure is reliable, the corruptive effect of the suggestive procedure is weighed against certain factors, such as the opportunity of the [victim] to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the [victim's] degree of attention, the accuracy of [the victim's] prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated at the [identification] and the time between the crime and the [identification].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.