Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.1d 266 - United States v. Wanamaker

United States v. Wanamaker’s Empirical Analysis

136 F. 266 · 1905

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 1905
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Cadwalader v. Wanamaker · United States v. Strauss Bros. & Co. · United States v. Strauss Bros. & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Collodion and all compounds of pyroxylin, whether known as celluloid or by any other name, 50 cents per pound; rolled or in sheets, unpolished, and not made up into articles, 60 cents per pound; if in finished or partly finished articles, and articles of which collodion or any compound of pyroxylin is the component material of chief value, 65 cents per pound and 25 per cent, ad valorem.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““An article constructed for the amusement of children; a plaything, as a doll or Noah’s ark; hence: any trifling or amusing object; any bauble or knickknack; trinket; trifle.” Standard Diet.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.