Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.1d 378 - Jorgenson v. Young

Jorgenson v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

136 F. 378 · 1905

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 1925
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Beebe · Paulina Whiting v. The Bank of the United States · Thomas v. Gabrielle Brockenbrough · Joseph Kennedy v. The Bank of the State of Georgia · Clark v. Killian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'“This application is denied. The petition- , ers have not shown such diligence as will entitle them to reopen a litigation that has been carried on with so much pertinacity for a great number of years. The new matter relied upon consists principally of record evidence drawn from the archives of the government, which might as easily have been found at the time the controversy arose as now. The treaty was a part of the law of the land, and the maps and official reports ■ have been on file in the proper government office, where they were discovered, for a quarter of a century. We are all of the opinion that, if a. bill of review should be filed containing all the averments that are in the present petition, it ought not to be sustained. Clearly, then, leave ought not to be granted for a continuance of the litigation.” -”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.