Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.1d 445 - Hamilton v. McClaughry

Hamilton v. McClaughry’s Empirical Analysis

136 F. 445 · 1905

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
July 1974
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1974

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

6019051910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Tobias Watkins · The United States v. Jonah Crosby · Runkle v. United States · Dynes v. Hoover · Coleman v. Tennessee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It therefore must follow, of necessity, if any punishment shall be meted out for the many crimes committed by persons in the military service of the United States during the occupation of China, such punishment must be imposed under the fifty-eighth article of war (now articles 92 and 93) or the offender go unpunished; and this is true, whether the military occupation of China by the forces of this government was by or against the consent of the government of China. That is to say, if the homicide committed is an offense at all, it was an offense committed in violation of the military laws of this country, transplanted to China, under the authority of the military department of this government, for the government of our military forces while there engaged in operations against the ‘Boxer Uprising,’ and for the protection of the citizens and representatives of this government and their property.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““As shown by the record, during the military occupation of China by the troops of this government, no less than 271 trials by general court-martial were had, which resulted in 244 convictions. Under the well-settled principles of law the offenders so tried were not amenable to the laws of the government of China, and the offenses by them committed, if any, whether by the laws of this country denominated as the crime of murder, robbery, larceny, or other felony, were not committed in violation of any law of China, because done by persons in the military service of this country while stationed in China.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In time of war, insurrection, or rebellion, larceny, robbery, * * * murder * * * shall be punishable by the sentence of a general court-martial, when committed by persons in the military service of the United States, and the punishment in any such case shall not be less than the punishment provided, for the like offense, by the laws of the state, territory, or district in which such offense may have been committed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.