In re Bicknell’s Empirical Analysis
136 F.2d 1016 · 1943
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1967
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Sola · In re Cole · In re Cady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * as far as appellants are concerned, the application of Jorgensen and that of Joeck [the winning interference parties] are prior art.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Risse Horlein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.