Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.2d 849 - King v. Richardson

King v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

136 F.2d 849 · 1943

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2021

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

60194319501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Throckmorton · Stone v. White · Smith v. Ayer · William Oliver and Micajah Williams v. Robert Piatt · Tilden v. . Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the application of the doctrine of laches, the settled rule is that courts of equity are not bound by, but that they usually act or refuse to act in analogy to, the statute of limitations relating to actions at law of like character . The meaning of this rule is that, under ordinary circumstances, a suit in equity will not be stayed for laches, before, and will be stayed after the time fixed by the analogous statute of limitations at law; but if unusual conditions or extraordinary circumstances make it inequitable to allow the prosecution of a suit after a briefer ... period than that fixed by the statute, the [court] will not be bound by the statute, but will determine the extraordinary case in accordance with the equities which condition it .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.