Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.3d 1146 - United States v. McClanahan

United States v. McClanahan’s Empirical Analysis

136 F.3d 1146 · 1998

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
November 2020
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably United States v. Staples (2000), United States v. Salinas (2004)

25 federal appellate ·

4201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stinson v. United States · Burns v. United States · United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan v. Leckie Smokeless Coal Co. · Hervey v. Shalala · United States v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant's revocation sentence is subject to review under the 'plainly unreasonable' standard because 'no guideline establishes a mandatory range of such a sentence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the nature and circumstances of the offense; the characteristics and the history of the defendant himself; the need for the sentence to reflect the serious ness of the offense and to promote respect for the law; the need to provide adequate deterrence and to protect the public from possible future criminal conduct by the defendant; and the kinds of sentences and the sentence range available based on the defendant’s conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a breach of the trust placed in a defendant by the original sentencing court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.