United States v. Neder’s Empirical Analysis
136 F.3d 1459 · 1998
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2012
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · United States v. Gaudin · Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Darden · Yates v. Evatt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme ... to defraud a financial institution ... by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any information necessary to a determination of a taxpayer's income tax liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.