Peralta v. U.S. Attorney's Office’s Empirical Analysis
136 F.3d 169 · 1998
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 16 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Sussman v. United States Marshals Service (2007), 254 F. Supp. 2d 23 - Maydak v. U.S. Department of Justice (2003)
4 federal appellate · 16 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Catlin v. United States · Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Abramson · United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts · District of Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc. · McGehee v. Central Intelligence Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is ultimately responsible for processing responsive records in its custody and control at the time of the FOIA request, [and that] a referral of records could constitute an improper withholding if the 'net effect [of the referral procedure] is significantly to impair the requester's ability to obtain the records or significantly to increase the amount of time he must wait to obtain them.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“FBI is subject to the FOIA in its own name”); McGehee v. Central Intelligence Agency, 697 F.2d 1095, 1108 (D.C.Cir.1983) (noting that the FBI”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ginarte v. Mueller“the district court lost track of the identity of the `defendant' in this litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.