Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.3d 481 - United States v. Page

United States v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

136 F.3d 481 · 1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 1999
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 2261 (§ 40221 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 2266 (§ 40221 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Relies on United States v. Lopez · Caminetti v. United States · United States v. Lanier · Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States · Ankenbrandt Lr Sr v. A Richards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 2261. Interstate domestic violence (a) Offenses.— (1) Crossing a State line. — A person who travels across a state line or enters or leaves Indian country with the intent to injure, harass, or intimidate that person’s spouse or intimate partner, and who, in the course of or as a result of such travel, intentionally commits a crime of violence and thereby causes bodily injury to such spouse or intimate partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). (2) Causing the crossing of a State line. — A person who causes a spouse or intimate partner to cross a State line or to enter or leave Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud and, in the course or as a result of that conduct, intentionally commits a crime of violence and thereby causes bodily injury to the person’s spouse or intimate partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Am I correct that, from the minute you left the apartment until the time that Derek left you at the hospital in Washington, Pennsylvania, that he did not strike you, hit, you, do anything of that nature? A. Right. Q. So the injuries that you presented with at the hospital in Washington, Pennsylvania were injuries that you suffered inside that apartment; isn’t that true? A. That’s true. Q. Once you got to the hospital, am I correct that you’re in a wheelchair, and somebody some man, white man, showed you down to the emergency room from where you were, where you first came in the hospital? A. Derek pushed me. He was directing us to the emergency room, and he was pushing me in the wheelchair.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “§ 2261. Traveling to commit spousal abuse (a) In GENERAL. — Any person who travels or causes another (including the intended victim) to travel across State lines or in interstate commerce and who, during the course of any such travel or thereafter, does an act that injures his or her spouse or intimate partner....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.