Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.3d 54 - Benitez-Pons v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Benitez-Pons v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s Empirical Analysis

136 F.3d 54 · 1998

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 48 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2001), Pearl v. City of Long Beach (2002)

29 federal appellate · 48 district ·

7001998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · Cada v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. · Charles Clauson v. Robert D. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]quitable tolling is unavailable where a party fails to exercise due diligence.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Courts weigh five factors in assessing claims of equitable tolling: (1) the lack of actual notice of the filing requirement; (2) the lack of constructive notice of the filing requirement; (3) the diligence in pursuing one's rights; (4) the absence of prejudice to the defendant; and (5) the plaintiff's reasonableness in remaining ignorant of the filing requirement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “muddle[d] the doctrines of equitable estoppel and equitable tolling [but] . . . assert[ed] elements of both doctrines, [the court] will analyze the equitable arguments under both estoppel and tolling theories”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.