Tyler v. Cisneros’s Empirical Analysis
136 F.3d 603 · 1998
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Shanks v. Dressel (2008), San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States (2005)
16 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Boarhead Corp. v. Erickson · Morris County Trust for Historic Preservation v. Pierce · Nevada Entertainment Industries, Inc. v. City of Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]itigation . . . and other conditions established in the environmental impact statement or during [the agency's] review and committed as part of the decision shall be implemented by the lead agency.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A complaint should not be dismissed unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim that would entitle [her] to relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), Mission Housing Development Corporation (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. James Tyler · Tyler v. Cisneros
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.