Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 F.3d 65 - United States v. Snyder

United States v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

136 F.3d 65 · 1998

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray (2000), Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co. (1998)

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

5901998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 991

Relies on Koon v. United States · United States v. Rivera · United States v. Sitton · United States v. Aguilar-Pena · United States v. Haynes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he fact that the national median for a broadly stated offense type may be above or below a particular defendant's [guideline sentencing range] cannot be used to justify a sentencing departure. Departures based on these kinds of perceived inequities `would contradict hopelessly the guidelines' structure and theory.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the court finds that there exists an aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines that should result in a sentence different from that described.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the region in which the defendant is convicted is likely to change the length of time served from approximately six months more if one is sentenced in the South to twelve months less if one is sentenced in Central California.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.