Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 FSUPP 854 - Mitchell v. Hodges Contracting Co.

Mitchell v. Hodges Contracting Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1967
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co. · Walling v. McCrady Const. Co. · Scholl v. McWilliams Dredging Co. · Parham v. Austin Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This is a nebulous field of law and the Administrator is constantly seeking to extend the coverage of the Act. Until the decision by the U. S. Supreme Court in Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co., Inc., supra, it is doubtful whether any of these projects would have been held to be within the coverage of the Act. The mere fact that the defendants and their counsel guessed wrong as to the interpretation of this Act does not reflect any bad faith on defendants’ part. The decision in the Voll-mer case was itself a 6-2 decision. This reflects the sincere good faith dispute which existed on this question.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.