State v. DeMello.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. · Franks v. City and County of Honolulu · Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo Hospital · Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall order [a] defendant to make restitution for reasonable and verified losses suffered by [a] victim or victims as a result of the defendant's offense when requested by the victim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Aki, Jr. · State v. Lee“HRS § 706-646 allows for restitution of a victim's losses that are (1) reasonable, (2) verified, (3) suffered as a result of the defendant's conduct, and (4) requested by the victim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Nahalea · State v. Foumai“4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER In Borge, the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court acknowledged that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.