Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 KAN 172 - Hanson v. Cornell

Hanson v. Cornell’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2009

10 state decisions

4019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Burrow · In re the Contempt of Hanson · Miller v. Clark · In re the Contempt of Hanson · Thompson v. State Board of Canvassers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Obviously the legislature intended that for one to be qualified to hold the office of judge of the district court, or of the supreme court of this state, his admission to practice law created a status which continued and under which he was engaged in the active and continuous practice of law up to the time of his election to such office.” (p. 175.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.