Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 KAN 228 - Genschorck v. Blumer

Genschorck v. Blumer’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1987

6 state decisions

20193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. Hallett · Head v. Spier · Sparks v. Bodensick · State v. Ellis · Tays v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Sec. 18. If the intestate leaves no issue, the whole of his estate shall go to his wife, and if he leaves no wife nor issue, the whole shall go to his father. “Sec. 19. If his father be previously dead, the portion which would have fallen to his share by the above rules, shall be disposed of in the same manner as though he had outlived the intestate and died in the possession and ownership of the portion thus falling to his share and so on through each ascending ancestor and his issue, unless heirs are sooner found. “Sec. 20. If heirs are not found in the male line, the portion thus uninherited shall go to the mother' of -the intestate and to her heirs, following the same rules as above prescribed.” “Sec. 22. If, still, there be property remaining uninherited, it shall be escheat to the Territory.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If the intestate leave no issue or wife, and if both of his parents are dead, one-half of the estate goes to the heirs of the deceased father, and the other half to the heirs of the deceased mother.” (Syl. ¶ 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.