Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 KAN 283 - State v. O'Keith

State v. O'Keith’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably State v. Minor (1966), Richardson v. Hand (1958)

21 state decisions

80193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Turner · Mastin v. Gray · In re Wallace · Revere v. Revere · State v. Dubray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On September 28 a boy who became sixteen years old on June 3 was arrested for statutory rape committed on May 27, all in the same year, and was brought before a justice of the peace. At a preliminary examination the boy’s age was disclosed, and the justice of the peace transferred the case to the juvenile court. The juvenile court referred the case to the district court for trial, a jury impaneled by the district court found the boy guilty, and the district court sentenced him on the verdict to the reformatory. Held, the district court had no jurisdiction to pronounce sentence on the verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A district court in this state is altogether without jurisdiction to deal with delinquencies of infants under sixteen years of age. It is the deliberate policy of this state that infants of tender years, however erring or wayward they may be, shall not be regarded as criminals or dealt with as such.” p.285.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.