Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 KAN 5 - State v. Dunning

State v. Dunning’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1952
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Metz · State v. Stuart · State v. Colson · State v. Herold · State v. Bozick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The elements of this possession are, first, the mental attitude of claimant, the intent to possess, to appropriate to oneself; and second, the effective realization of this attitude. . . . All the authorities agree that an intent to exclude others must coexist with the external facts, and must be fulfilled in the external physical facts, in order to constitute possession.’ ” (p. 6.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.