Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 KAN 613 - Leamos v. Wilson & Co.

Leamos v. Wilson & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 1954
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 1954

22 state decisions

100193219401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co. · Shay v. Hill · Paul v. Skelly Oil Co. · Monson v. Battelle · Blackburn v. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The questions open to review in the appeal to this court are limited to those of law. On questions of fact determined by the district court, its findings are controlling in this court, if there is evidence to sustain them. We have seen that there is evidence from which a reasonable inference may be drawn that lends support to the findings of the trial court. When that appears it practically closes the controversy and ends our jurisdiction.” (p. 737.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.