Parrish v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 1938 · most notably Coblentz v. State (1933), Cavanaugh v. Commonwealth (1916)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Meadowcroft v. People · Morse v. Commonwealth · State v. Beach · State v. Sattley · Ellis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“<£It is also said that the Commonwealth should have shown that Parrish received himself the deposit, or assented to the receiving of it, by directing an employe to receive it, or being present when it was received. It is not necessary that the Commonwealth should prove either of these facts. When evidence was introduced that Parrish was president of the bank, and that it remained open for the transaction of business and the reception of deposits with his consent or with his knowledge, the law will presume that he assented to the receiving of the de-. posit, and charge him with notice that it was received, if the books or records of the bank so showed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““In prosecutions under the statute it is indispensable that the Commonwealth shall establish three facts: First, that the deposit described in the indictment was actually received; second, that at the time, it was received the bank was insolvent; third, that the officer indicted had knowledge of its insolvency, and with such knowledge, assented to receiving the deposit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The word ‘deposit,’ when used in this connection, has a well-understood popular meaning, and implies that the depositor has placed in the bank money, or evidences or representatives of money, snch as banks of deposit are authorized to and do receive.” Parrish v. Commonwealth, 136 Ky. 77 , 123 S. W. 339 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.