Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 ME 299 - State v. Dunn

State v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2025

7 state decisions

201939194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Assuredly, as argued, where the words of a statute may by their generality embrace cases falling within its literal terms, which are not within its meaning or spirit, the indictment must be enlarged beyond the words of its enactment, and allege all facts necessary to bring the case within legislative intent. State v. Lashus, 79 Me., 541, 11 A., 604 ; State v. Doran, 99 Me., 329, 59 A., 440 ; State v. Conant, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.