Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 MICH 191 - Roberts v. Bidwell

Roberts v. Bidwell’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
December 1945
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1945

14 state decisions

5019041910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fraser v. Jennison · Kempsey v. McGinniss · Beaubien v. Cicotte · Rivard v. Rivard · Prentis v. Bates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This opinion, if read in the light of the writer’s opinion in the case of White v. Bailey, 10 Mich. 161 , leaves no room for doubting that it is the settled law of Michigan that an opinion that a testator was incompetent can only be given when the witness has testified to circumstances upon which it is predicated, and which to some extent justify it. (Citing cases.) The extent to which such proof must go cannot be limited by an inflexible rule. It must depend upon the familiarity of the witness with the testator, the character of the disqualification, the nature and number of extraordinary circumstances detailed, and proximity to the act involved in point of time. Taken as a whole, they should move the judicial discretion of the trial judge, by apprising him that the witness may fairly doubt the competency of the person upon reasonable grounds; and this discretion must be carefully exercised.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.