Stravs v. Steckbauer’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1968
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wentworth v. Tubbs · Howes v. Reliance Wire-Works Co. · Nye v. Kahlow · McCausland v. West Duluth Land Co. · Minneapolis Plumbing Co. v. Arcade Investment Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * By this provision a presumption of consent to improvements is raised; prima fade at least, against the owner, and, if he does not consent but wishes to protect his interests, he must do so by serving or posting notices, and the burden of proving such notice is upon the owner.” ■ '”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. Harrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.