Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 Mo. 1

State v. Norman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 20, 1896

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1896-11-20

— Hon. John A. Hookah ay, Judge. The assault attempted to be charged in this case, being a felony, it was indispensable that the indictment should charge that the act, to wit, the assault, was done with a felonious intent, which it fails to do, hence is fatally defective. State v. Wood, 124 Mo. 412; State v. Fairlamb, 121 Mo. 137; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516; State v. Merrill, 97 Mo. 105; State v. Fmerich, 87 Mo. 110; 2 Bishop, Crim. Proc., secs. 79, 651, 653.

Relies on State v. Fairlamb · State v. Clayton · State v. Wood

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1896-11-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1931

9 state decisions

3018961900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Shebwood, J.

¶1The defendant, a negro, was in-dieted for shooting one Fred. Johnson, another son of Ham, in the back with a pistol, and being tried was found guilty and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. From judgment and sentence on the verdict he appeals to this court.

¶2The substantial portion of the indictment is the following:

“Ev. Norman, late of the county aforesaid, on the twenty-first day of July, 1894, at the said county 'of Boone, state aforesaid, in and upon one Fred. Johnson, in the peace of the state then and there being unlawfully and feloniously an assault did make, and that the said Ev. Norman did then and there with force and arms, unlawfully and feloniously with a pistol then and there loaded with gunpowder and leaden balls, which pistol he, the said Ev. Norman, in his hand then and there had and held did unlawfully and feloniously shoot oft, to, against, and upon the said Fred. Johnson, whereby the said Fred. Johnson was then *3and there greatly wounded, his life endangered, and received great bodily harm against the peace and dignity of the state.
“J. L. Stephens,
‘ ‘Prosecuting Attorney.
“A true bill.
“L. T. Henry,
“Foreman of Grand Jury.”

¶3The attorney general admits the indictment insufficient, because of not charging that the assault was made with a felonious intent. Correct. State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, and cases cited; State v. Fairlamb, 121 Mo. 137; State v. Wood, 124 Mo. 412.

¶4The insufficiency of the indictment renders the decision of any other question unnecessary. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

All concur.
/136/mo/1 · .json · Public domain