Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 Mo. 25

State v. Luttrell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 20, 1896

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1896-11-20

<p>Criminal Practice: appeal: record proper. Where defendant saved no exception to the action of the court in overruling the motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, and there is no error in the record proper, the judgment will he affirmed.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1914

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1896-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gantt, P. J.

¶1The defendant was indicted and convicted in Ozark county for abducting the daughter of William Aden for the purpose of concubinage. He has saved no exceptions to the action of the court in overruling his motions for new trial and in arrest, and consequently we have only the record proper before us for review. We find no error in the record proper and the judgment of the circuit court must be and is affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.
/136/mo/25 · .json · Public domain