¶1This case is here on a short transcript. The printed abstract of the record neither contains an affidavit for an appeal nor alludes to one. It says the time for filing bill of exceptions was extended, but not that this was done before the time originally given had expired. With the record in this State wTe are compelled by a point-blank decision of the Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal. [Shemwell v. McKinney, 214 Mo. 692, 114 S. W. 1038.] It is so ordered.
136 Mo. App. 16
Mathis v. Baxter
Decided March 9, 1909
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1909-03-09
<p>APPELLATE PRACTICE: Abstract of Record: Affidavit for Appeal: Filing Bill of Exceptions. AVhere, in a case appealed on a short form, the printed abstract of the record contained no mention of the affidavit for appeal and failed to state that the time extended for filing the hill of exceptions was made before the time originally given had expired, the appeal should he dismissed for failure.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1910
1 state decisions
Relies on Shemwell v. McKinney
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Dismissed · Decided 1909-03-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →