Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 N.C. App. 520 - State v. Robinson

136 N.C. App. 520 - State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Disbarment of Alexander · Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey · State v. Barnes · Dollar v. United States · State v. Blankenship

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] defendant may be convicted for a crime committed by another if the State proves the defendant acted “in concert” with the other to commit the crime. ... In addition to the proof requirements associated with acting in concert, if the crime is a specific intent crime, such as robbery with a dangerous weapon, the defendant, like the actual perpetrator, must be shown to have the requisite specific intent. “The specific intent may be proved by evidence tending to show that the specific intent crime was a part of the common plan.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`When the trial court instructs the jury not to consider incompetent evidence, any prejudice is ordinarily cured.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.