136 N.C. App. 634 - State v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · United States v. Goodwin · State v. Robbins · State v. Hicks · 89 N.C. App. 584 - State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the trial court determines that a reasonable inference of the defendant's guilt may be drawn from the evidence, it must deny the defendant's motion even though the evidence may also support reasonable inferences of the defendant's innocence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]vidence of an out-of-court statement of a witness, related by the in-court testimony of another witness, may be offered as substantive evidence 1 or offered for the limited purpose of corroborating the credibility of the witness making the out-of-court statement. 2”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the offering party does not designate the purpose for which the evidence is offered, the evidence is admissible if it qualifies either as corroborative evidence or competent substantive evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.