Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 NCAPP 663 - Marsh v. Marsh

Marsh v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Arthur · State v. . Baker · 132 N.C. App. 401 - Wells v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is important to note that we understand that the General Assembly may have intended postseparation support to be a temporary measure. However, we are bound to interpret statutes as they are written. If the General Assembly feels that the policy of this State should be that postseparation support ends upon a judgment of divorce then it is within its power to amend the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.