Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 NH 522 - State v. Silvestri

State v. Silvestri’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
5
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

5 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably State v. Thein (1999), State v. Canelo (1995)

5 district · 24 state decisions

170199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · State v. Ball · State v. Doe · State v. Carroll · State v. Hazen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before the magistrate, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information, was there a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime would be found in the particular place described in the warrant?”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The State urges us to adopt a per se rule that if the magistrate determines that a person is a drug dealer, then a finding of probable cause to search that person's residence automatically follows.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “some nexus between the defendant's residence and drug-dealing activities [be shown] in order to establish probable cause to search the residence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.