Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 N.J.L. 527 - State v. Friedman

State v. Friedman’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 1961
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. State · State v. Verona · State v. Wines · State v. Jefferson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * there is a distinction between that situation and one when the evidence is merely circumstantial from which the jury may draw an inference of the defendant's guilt of the charge. The defendant could only meet such a possible inference by a general denial of the charge. This he does not have to do and therefore he cannot be criticised for such refusal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “silence would justify a strong inference that he could not deny the charges,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.