Lee v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 district · 69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Quynh Truong v. Allstate Insurance (2010), State v. Domicz (2006)
2 district · 69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · United States v. Scheffer · Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey · United States v. Bonds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Legislative facts are those which help the tribunal to determine the content of law and policy and to exercise its judgment or discretion in determining what course of action to take.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Given the capabilities of jurors and the liberal thrust of the rules of evidence, we believe any doubt regarding the admissibility of scientific evidence should be resolved in favor of admission, rather than exclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he purpose of Rule 11-702 is 'to assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence and to determine the issues of fact.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Walker v. Spina · State v. Fry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.