State v. Rosales’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably State v. Bullcoming (2010), State v. Otto (2007)
4 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · Washington v. Texas · Rock v. Arkansas · Crane v. Kentucky · United States v. Scheffer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schackow“[e]xtrajudicial statements . . . may properly be received into evidence, not for the truth of the assertions therein contained, . . . but for such legitimate purposes as that of . . . effect on the hearer. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Otto“a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Otto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.