Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 N.M. 280 - Morales v. Reynolds

Morales v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal Schools (2005), Salazar v. Torres (2007)

42 state decisions

230200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · Roth v. Thompson · Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc. · Segura v. Molycorp, Inc. · Knapp v. Fraternal Order of Eagles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the worker or employer engages in an intentional act or omission, without just cause or excuse, that is reasonably expected to result in the injury suffered by the worker; (2) the worker or employer expects the intentional act or omission to result in the injury, or has utterly disregarded the consequences; and (3) the intentional act or omission proximately causes the injury.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Both laws] fulfill[] [their] purpose through a bargain in which an injured worker gives up his or her right to sue the employer for damages in return for an expedient settlement covering medical expenses and wage benefits, while the employer gives up its defenses in return for immunity from a tort claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “egregious employer conduct: a combination of deadly conditions, profit-motivated disregard for easily implemented safety measures, complete lack of worker training or preparation, and outright denial of assistance to a worker in a terrifying situation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.