Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 N.M. 561 - State v. Dedman

State v. Dedman’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 126 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2020 · most notably Bullcoming v. New Mexico (2011), State v. Saucier (2007)

2 federal appellate · 126 state decisions — followed in 23 states

1000200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · White v. Illinois · State v. Lankford · Horton v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prior testimony at a preliminary hearing, before a grand jury, or at a former trial, and police interrogations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Cook, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2005) · Village of Granville v. Pumphrey, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2007)
  2. “a blood alcohol report is generated by [Department of Health] personnel, not law enforcement, and the report is not investigative or prosecutorial,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (4-3-2006) · State v. Cook, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2005)
  3. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Zamarripa · State v. Lopez

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.