Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 Ohio App. 3d 184 - State v. Fair

136 Ohio App. 3d 184 - State v. Fair’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · United States v. Benz · State v. Nagle · 108 Ohio App. 3d 264 - State v. Gregory · 131 Ohio App. 3d 118 - State v. Hines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he sentencing court generally makes the factual determination regarding the number of days the prisoner was confined for any reason arising out of the subject offense[,] the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction is the body statutorily mandated to credit the time served and reduce the prisoner's sentence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'regardless of whether the confinement is ordered as part of the original sentence or sometime thereafter upon the imposition of a more restrictive community control sanction[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he crux of the issue is whether the offender was confined, not the date of the confinement in relation to the date of the original sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.