Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 Ohio App. 3d 377 - State v. King

136 Ohio App. 3d 377 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Schiebel · Richards v. Wisconsin · 95 Ohio App. 3d 93 - State v. Curry · 85 Ohio App. 3d 623 - State v. Claytor · 11 Ohio App. 3d 158 - Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “factual issues are involved in determining a motion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Harris, Unpublished Decision (5-5-2005) · State v. Bennett, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2006)
  2. “the trial court did not do so. Nevertheless, we conclude that the trial court's failure to provide its”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Bennett, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2006)
  3. “state its essential findings on the record”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Bennett, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2006)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.