136 Ohio App. 3d 555 - Daup v. Tower Cellular, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co. (2001), Courie v. Alcoa (2005)
3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 19 Ohio St. 3d 100 - Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. · Burr v. Board of County Commissioners · Kenty v. Transamerica Premium Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * You are going to be my — you know, my right-hand guy for a long, long time. We are going to have many other businesses. We are going to have many other ventures together. We have a great sales staff here. We will implement new products with them. You know, see the big picture. Look at this five, ten years from now. Look where you are going to be. Look how well you are doing now. It's just going to get bigger and better. And so was there an exact date set? No. But to me, five, ten years came up all the time. (Daup, Depo. 124.) Daup further testified that he and LeVeque would go to lunch and LeVeque would tell him "we were going to get into something else and that we could move our sales force into another opportunity * * * . And * * * he always told me to look at the big picture and see yourself five years from now." (Daup, Depo. 82-83.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"A service contract of indefinite duration, in which one party agrees to procure customers or accounts or orders on behalf of the second party, is not by its terms performable, within a year-and hence must be in writing ... since performance is dependent, not upon the will of the parties to the contract, but upon that of a third party." 2 N.Y.2d at 550 [ 161 N.Y.S.2d 428 , 141 N.E.2d 819 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Thus, `under the employment-at-will doctrine, the employment relationship between employer and employee is terminable at the will of either,' and an employee `is subject to discharge by an employer at any time, even without cause.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.