136 Ohio App. 3d 86 - Snader v. Job Master Services’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · 33 Ohio App. 3d 339 - State v. Otten · 90 Ohio App. 3d 400 - Wozniak v. Wozniak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When evaluating whether a judgment is against the manifest weight of the evidence in a civil context, the standard of review is the same as that in the criminal context.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The trial court committed prejudicial error in finding in favor of plaintiff as such ruling was against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.