Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 Okla. 5 - Winans v. Harn

Winans v. Harn’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1939
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. Wilson · Lowrance v. Henry · Penny v. Vose · Galbreath v. Mayo · Luster v. First Nat. Bank in Oklahoma City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘When a trial is had before the court without a jury, the court must eventually weigh the testimony for the purpose of determining where the preponderance is, and there is no reason why it should not do so at the earliest possible time when the rights of the' plaintiff will not be cut off or impaired by its so doing, and when the plaintiff has introduced all his proof and rested, no right of his will be impaired if the court then determines what has been proven’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.