Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 S. Ct. 1356

Davis v. Michigan

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2016-03-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2018

3 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“On remand, courts should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief. The Court's disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioner's sentence actually qualifies as a mandatory life without parole sentence .”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Jones v. Commonwealth

“whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Jones v. Commonwealth

Relies on Montgomery v. Louisiana

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The motion of petitioner in No. 14-8106 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan. Petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Michigan for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

¶2Justice THOMAS, with whom Justice ALITO joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case:

¶3The Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016). In holding this petition and now vacating and remanding the judgment below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioner's asserted entitlement to retroactive relief 'is properly presented in the case.' Id., at ----, 136 S.Ct. 718 (slip op., at 13). On remand, court should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief. The Court's disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bar relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioner's sentence actually qualify as mandatory life without parole sentence.

/136/sct/1356 · .json · Public domain