¶1On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).
¶2Justice THOMAS, with whom Justice ALITO joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: The Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016). In holding this petition and now vacating and remanding the judgment below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioner's asserted entitlement to retroactive relief "is properly presented in the case." Id., at ----, 136 S.Ct. at 732. On remand, courts should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief. The Court's disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioner's sentence actually qualifies as a mandatory life without parole sentence.
¶3Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate and remand. I concur in the decision to grant, vacate and remand. See Adams v. Alabama, 578 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1796, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2016) (Alito, J., concurring).
¶4Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate and remand. I concur in the decision to grant, vacate and remand. See Adams v. Alabama, 578 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1796, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2016) (Sotomayor, J., concurring).