Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 S. Ct. 494

In re James-Bey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 9, 2015

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2015-11-09

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Commonwealth v. Martinez (2017), Commonwealth v. Molina (2017)

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relies on Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-11-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from the petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *495Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

/136/sct/494 · .json · Public domain