Chaupette v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 715 So. 2d 174 - Foster v. Noel · Hobgood v. State · 925 So. 2d 825 - Smith v. State · 675 So. 2d 308 - Cotton v. State · 643 So. 2d 524 - Sample v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A treating physician must be designated as an expert if the treating physician goes beyond historical facts personally observed and evaluates the evidence in an attempt to explain it to the jury. Therefore, our precedent forbids treating physicians not designated as experts from testifying to standards of care, causation, or using their expertise to explain the significance of a diagnosis or answer hypothetical questions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“We give great deference to the discretion of the trial judge, and unless we conclude that the [decision] was arbitrary and clearly erroneous, amounting to an abuse of discretion, the trial judge's decision will stand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Moreover, we may reverse ... only if the admission or exclusion of evidence results in prejudice and harm or adversely affects a substantial right of a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.