Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 So. 3d 793

In re Garrity

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 4, 2014

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2014-04-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2018

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-04-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled earned fees with client funds in his trust account and failed to provide a reasonable periodic accounting to a client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Robert T. Garrity, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 5951, be suspended from the prae-tice of law for a period of six months. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a one-year period of supervised probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/136/so3d/793 · .json · Public domain