State v. Nicasio’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably State v. Derouchie (1981), State v. Caron (1990)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brewer v. Williams · People v. Thomas · State v. Morrill · State v. Orlandi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Clearly inform him of the right of a person to be represented by an attorney and of a needy person to be represented at public expense; and (2) If the person detained or charged does not have an attorney and does not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to have an attorney when detained or charged, [the law enforcement officer shall] notify the appropriate public defender that he is not so represented. This shall be done upon commencement of detention, formal charge, or post-conviction proceeding, as the case may be. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Picknell“(a) If a person who is being detained by a law enforcement officer without charge or judicial process [as was the case here], or ... is not represented by an attorney under conditions in which a person having his own counsel would be entitled to be so represented, the law enforcement officer . . . shall: (1) Clearly inform him of the right of a person to be represented by an attorney and of a needy person to be presented at public expense ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Duff“A person who steals from the actual or constructive possession of another, other than from his person, money, goods, [or] chattels . . . shall be imprisoned not more than ten years or.fined not more than $500.00, or both, if the money or other property stolen exceeds $100.00 in value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hanson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.