Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 Wash. 243

241 P 684

Hancock v. Muldoon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1925

Washington Supreme Court · decided 1925-10-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2000

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*256 On Rehearing.

¶2 [Department One. December 28, 1925.]

Per Curiam.

¶3 — The petition for rehearing calls the court’s attention to an inadvertent statement of fact in the Departmental opinion. It was there stated that the trial court had reduced the attorney’s fees five hundred dollars. This was erroneous, for the trial court, after reducing the allowance, later restored it to the original figure. The allowance of $500 attorney’s fees, therefore, will be stricken from the opinion.

¶4 This does not affect the ultimate result inasmuch as no judgment was asked by appellant; and with this allowance stricken, there still remains a deficiency, of $1,011.55. However, in the interests of accuracy, this correction is made. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is denied.

/136/wash/243 · .json · Public domain